Every release, your team asks the same question. Slack threads, status meetings, last-minute scrambles. PilotRelease answers it with data — automatically, continuously, before anyone has to ask.
Nobody remembers. The last scan was 3 weeks ago. You deploy anyway and hope for the best. Monday morning, your VP asks about the vulnerability report.
The dashboard shows Security: 95/100, last scan 2 days ago. You know exactly what was found and what was fixed. Deploy with confidence.
Tests passed. But someone refactored the auth module last week and nobody re-ran the security scan. The old results looked green — they were just stale.
When auth code changes, the security score automatically drops. The system tells you: "3 auth files changed — re-run security scan before release." No guessing.
Screenshots of dashboards. Exported CSVs. Manually written evidence documents. "When was the last penetration test?" "Let me check my email..."
One click: export compliance evidence package. Every scan, every fix, every code review — automatically documented with timestamps and chain of custody. Audit prep: 10 minutes.
You changed 15 files. Which ones need testing? All of them? Just the controllers? What about the database migration? Nobody has a clear answer.
The system reads your commit, classifies every file (code vs config vs docs), and tells you exactly which quality milestones are affected. Documentation changes? Zero impact. Auth changes? Security re-scan required.
Run manually, results in separate dashboard, nobody checks after week 1
Green checkmark in CI, but does it actually cover what changed?
Last load test was "before the big refactor." Results are somewhere in Slack.
A spreadsheet. Updated quarterly. By the intern. Who left.
"Does everyone feel good about this release?" *silence* "OK, let's ship it."
Real screens from the platform. Not mockups.
Paste your Git URL. The system clones it, reads your tech stack, and creates a quality plan automatically. Java? Python? React? It knows what to test.
Security scans run. Test coverage is measured. Code quality is assessed. Engineering practices are detected. All automatic.
One number: 0-100. It goes up when tests pass. It drops when untested code is pushed. It tells you exactly what's blocking the release.
Score above 80? Ship it. Below? The system tells you the 2 things to fix. Not a spreadsheet. Not a meeting. Just: "fix this, then you're ready."
Every scan, every test, every code review is automatically documented as compliance evidence. When the auditor asks "show me your vulnerability management process" — you click one button.
Each one is patented. Together they create something that doesn't exist anywhere else.
Pushed 3 files to the auth module? Your security score automatically drops from 95 to 47. Not because something broke — because the old scan results are now stale. Changed a README? Score stays the same. The system knows the difference between code and documentation.
Found a SQL injection in v3.0. Fixed it in v3.1. Came back in v3.2. The system tracks the entire lifecycle — found, triaged, fixed, verified, reopened. Your Jira ticket gets reopened automatically. Your readiness score takes a 120% penalty because the fix didn't stick.
All 10 API tests pass. Green checkmarks everywhere. But during those tests, the app logged 47 "connection pool exhausted" errors. Nobody noticed. PilotRelease notices. It reads the runtime logs, correlates with test execution, and tells you: "Test passed but the app is unhealthy."
Don't choose which security tools to run. Tell us you need PCI-DSS 11.2 compliance. The system automatically selects nmap vulnerability scan + nuclei CVE detection + ZAP web testing, runs them in sequence with pass/fail gates, and maps results directly to the compliance control. One click, full audit.
You changed AuthService.java. Last 7 times someone changed that file, TestLoginFlow failed. PilotRelease tells you before you even run the tests: "78% chance TestLoginFlow will fail." Tests run in predicted-failure order — broken ones first, fast feedback.
Every scan, every test, every code review is automatically documented as compliance evidence. When the auditor asks "show me your vulnerability management process" — you click one button. Evidence package with chain of custody: who found it, who fixed it, who verified it. PDF ready.
Three numbers that tell the complete story. No more "it depends."
"How close are we?" Everything that passed, everything that failed, weighted by importance. One number, no opinions.
"What could go wrong?" Measures untested code, stale results, unresolved findings. Even if readiness is high, high risk means something's hiding.
"Can we trust the score?" If security is 100 but performance is 0, the average lies. Confidence catches that. Low confidence = dig deeper.
6 provisional patents cover the algorithms that make this work. The scoring engine, commit impact analysis, log correlation, compliance mapping, predictive testing, and scan orchestration — this technology doesn't exist anywhere else.
Set up in 10 minutes. See your readiness score in 15. Ship with confidence by end of day.
Try It Free